Go Back   Forums > Business Law > International Law

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 06:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Default Do you know how civilians are to be treated by international law in a war?

Article 51: Protection of the Civilian Population1. The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations. To give effect to this protection, the following rules, which are additional to other applicable rules of international law, shall be observed in all circumstances.2. The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.3. Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.4. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. Indiscriminate attacks are:1. those which are not directed at a specific military objective;2. those which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or3. those which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by this Protocol; and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction.# Among others, the following types of attacks are to be considered as indiscriminate:1. an attack by bombardment by any methods or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives located in a city, town, village or other area containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian objects; and2. an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated5. Among others, the following types of attacks are to be considered as indiscriminate:1. an attack by bombardment by any methods or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives located in a city, town, village or other area containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian objects; and2. an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.6. Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.7. The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield, favor or impede# military operations. The Parties to the conflict shall not direct the movement of the civilian population or individual civilians in order to attempt to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield military operations.# Any violation of these prohibitions shall not release the Parties to the conflict from their legal obligations with respect to the civilian population and civilians, including the obligation to take the precautionary measures provided for in Article 57.Protocol 1Additional to the Geneva Conventions, 1977These regulations are law under the US Constitution because the treaties have been signed by the USA. They are also re-affirmed at each Presidential inauguration. ------
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 01:16 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Default

What is this under?Geneva Convention?Treaty?UN? ------
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:50 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Default

don't tell us. tell the Pentagon and its supporters ------
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 01:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Default

And, your point is? ------
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-29-2009, 01:42 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Someone should tell Bush.He'd only veto it. ------
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2011, 03:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 872
Exclamation Putter Debate - Tiger Woods Putter

Putter Debate - Tiger Woods PutterGolf equipment is never a story at a tournament — until it becomes a story on tiger woods latest news. "I've switched to the Nike putter for this week," Woods said. The Scotty Cameron putter made by Titleist has been as much a part of Woods game as his Sunday red shirt. Then, last week, the world's No. 1 player swapped out the Titleist putter he'd used to win 13 of his 14 major championships in favor of a Nike Method 001 — the week of the British Open!Several scribes who couldn't tell a Nike swoosh from a Titleist T approached me in the Media Center at St. Andrews and asked questions like this: "So, ah ... what's the deal with this tiger woods putter. It's new, right?" What's Your opinion? Here comes a Putter Debate - Tiger Woods Putter, which is more fit for him? and will the new nike method putter can help him to lower his golf handicap? Let's discuss.
__________________
golf clubs for sale
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On